← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Weatherford

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 29. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
29
detected
35,903
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Parker

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-07-01 → 1997-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-07-01 → 1997-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-07-01 → 1997-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-04-01 → 1997-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-04-01 → 1997-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-04-01 → 1997-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0051 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFBS 0.0050 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfba 0.0120 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0043 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFOS 0.0054 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
685.5 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 760 µg/L
230/231 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
28.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.9 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
35.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.4 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
20.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L
115/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
32.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.4 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
81.86 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.7 µg/L
107/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
46.74 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.7 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
9.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L
103/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
98/115 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
159.5 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
95/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
93/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
71/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
45/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.51 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L
25/95 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
209 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Fluoride
592 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 606 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.317 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.01 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
67.8 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Cyanide
141.55 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 148 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chromium
1.2 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
1.2 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Selenium
2.06 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PASCHALL, PAUL
Phone
817-598-4201

Frequently asked questions about City of Weatherford

Is City of Weatherford tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in City of Weatherford's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Weatherford's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Weatherford serve?

City of Weatherford reports serving 35,903 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Weatherford had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for City of Weatherford, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.