Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Timber Line Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
14
detected
579
people served
5
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
28
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-11-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2016-02-08

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
2184 µg/L 168%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3900 µg/L
14/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0012 mg/L 8.1%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 4/4 LCR 2025
Arsenic
5.245 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
239.15 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
2.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
6.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
358 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
11.585 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.8 pCi/L 76%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.8 pCi/L 25%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.9 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2014
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WAGNER, RICHARD, LYNN
Phone
936-856-4199

Frequently asked questions about Timber Line Estates

Is Timber Line Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Timber Line Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Timber Line Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Timber Line Estates serve?

Timber Line Estates reports serving 579 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Timber Line Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 28 violations on file for Timber Line Estates, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.