Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Addressed | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Addressed | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Addressed | 2026-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Addressed | 2025-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Addressed | 2025-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Addressed | 2025-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0023 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Copper | 934.4 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1010 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.3 µg/L | 5/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.214 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.87 µg/L | 5/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 13.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 5/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.412 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.02 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 22.074 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.4 µg/L | 5/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.794 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.52 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| TTHM | 61.42 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.8 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 17.91 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.738 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.7075 pCi/L 54% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.94 pCi/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.75 pCi/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.676 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.74 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 358.6 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 371 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Fluoride | 177 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.03 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 8.2 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
35 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mountain Village Development
Is Mountain Village Development tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Mountain Village Development's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mountain Village Development's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mountain Village Development serve?
Mountain Village Development reports serving 77 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Mountain Village Development had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 211 violations on file for Mountain Village Development, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.