Is New Waterford Village Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Columbiana

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

299

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	200.8 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 229 µg/L	43/43	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate	4552.5 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 4950 µg/L	26/30	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	8.2 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 10 µg/L	25/43	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0022 mg/L 14% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	21/21	LCR	2025
Dibromochloromethane	9.125 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L	16/17	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	3.84 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.23 µg/L	14/16	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromoform	13.505 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L	14/16	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	28.42 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L	13/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	10.7705 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L	10/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	2.16 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	9/17	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	7.7255 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.82 µg/L	8/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	153.6 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 168 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2014–2019
Chromium	5.594 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 5.96 µg/L	3/7	SYR4	2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	1.395 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.42 µg/L	3/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	3.686 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.89 pCi/L	3/3	SYR4	2017–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	4791 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 4950 µg/L	3/5	SYR4	2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	2.6695 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.72 µg/L	2/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.762 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.91 µg/L	2/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Selenium	1.829 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 1.86 µg/L	2/7	SYR4	2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	1.974 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.98 µg/L	2/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Arsenic	2.21 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	1/7	SYR4	2014–2019
Fluoride	350 µg/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	1/6	SYR4	2014–2019

45 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDiquatEndothallEthylbenzeneGlyphosateLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)TrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: GORBY, JASON
Phone: 330-457-2844
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about New Waterford Village

Is New Waterford Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in New Waterford Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Waterford Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Waterford Village serve?

New Waterford Village reports serving 1,238 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has New Waterford Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 299 violations on file for New Waterford Village, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.