Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 6945 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8000 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 15.9 pCi/L 106% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 20 pCi/L | 26/27 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 22.9162 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.193 µg/L | 25/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 193 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 310 µg/L | 19/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.8 pCi/L 56% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 18/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 700 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 5700 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Barium | 100 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 12/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.25 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 10.4 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 7/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 6/14 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/14 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.85 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 4/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 3/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.65 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 0.5790 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5800 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 8 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Burns Board of Public Utilities
Is Burns Board of Public Utilities tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Burns Board of Public Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Burns Board of Public Utilities's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Combined Uranium, Copper, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Burns Board of Public Utilities serve?
Burns Board of Public Utilities reports serving 1,024 people in Wyoming, per its EPA record.
Has Burns Board of Public Utilities had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 139 violations on file for Burns Board of Public Utilities, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.