Tap WaterIndex

← Wyoming

Tap water quality report

Baggs, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
19
detected
400
people served
69
health-based violations
Wyoming rankingsLead in WyomingPFAS in Wyoming
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Carbon

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

69
health-based violations
103
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
117.1 µg/L 146%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 129 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
58.7 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 23/23 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
90.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
21/23 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
34.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0090 mg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.6100 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6200 µg/L
11/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
11/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
833.5 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 910 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
4.7 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
380 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
57 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.6735 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6800 µg/L
2/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.4 pCi/L 48%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.8 pCi/L 12%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
10.4 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Thallium, Total
0.9000 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BARBER, SARAH
Phone
307-380-7335
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Baggs, Town of

Is Baggs, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Baggs, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Baggs, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Baggs, Town of serve?

Baggs, Town of reports serving 400 people in Wyoming, per its EPA record.

Has Baggs, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 103 violations on file for Baggs, Town of, of which 69 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.