Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2023-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 474.4 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1170 µg/L | 39/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 4.302 pCi/L 86% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.66 pCi/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 14.8 pCi/L 99% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 18.1 pCi/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Barium | 151.2 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 1702 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1750 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 10.54 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 pCi/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Arsenic | 6.7175 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.74 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0039 mg/L 26% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 40.19 µg/L 268% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 40.3 µg/L | 12/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 14.11 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 12/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 11/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 10/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 9/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.675 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 6/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 5/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.50967 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.54667 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 3/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 3/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Muskego Water Utility
Is Muskego Water Utility tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Muskego Water Utility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Muskego Water Utility's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Muskego Water Utility serve?
Muskego Water Utility reports serving 8,150 people, per its EPA record.
Has Muskego Water Utility had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 103 violations on file for Muskego Water Utility, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.