Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1991-03-01 → 1991-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 1190 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1280 µg/L | 98/196 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 201 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 219 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 5.4 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 21/41 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0064 mg/L 43% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 14.7633 pCi/L 98% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 15.1867 pCi/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.7695 pCi/L 75% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.9 pCi/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| TTHM | 13.3365 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.53 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 10.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 8/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.293 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.51 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 5/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 23.985 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.14 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Nitrate | 140 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.9095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9200 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 9.09 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.0815 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.1400 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sauk City Waterworks
Is Sauk City Waterworks tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Sauk City Waterworks's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sauk City Waterworks's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Lead, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sauk City Waterworks serve?
Sauk City Waterworks reports serving 3,518 people in Wisconsin, per its EPA record.
Has Sauk City Waterworks had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for Sauk City Waterworks, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.