← Washington

Tap water quality report

Port Angeles Composite

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
24
detected
8,872
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clallam

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
39
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0050 µg/L 1/14 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
69.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 103.6 µg/L
71/75 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
73.2 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105.3 µg/L
71/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
67/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
52.85 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.9 µg/L
55/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
24.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.6 µg/L
53/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
30.035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L
48/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
39/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1364.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1410 µg/L
34/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Bromoform
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
9 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.95 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
3/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
130 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1058 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1140 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.95 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
1.265 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
3.375 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
6 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.7 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
7.4 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2014–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
Bowen Kendrick

Frequently asked questions about Port Angeles Composite

Is Port Angeles Composite tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Port Angeles Composite's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Port Angeles Composite's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Port Angeles Composite serve?

Port Angeles Composite reports serving 8,872 people in Washington, per its EPA record.

Has Port Angeles Composite had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for Port Angeles Composite, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.