Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-08 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 67.43 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 109.82 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 76.7075 µg/L 128% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.48 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 157.4 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L | 47/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.227 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.59 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Chloroform | 48.658 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55.76 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 28.5965 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.42 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 37.823 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.52 µg/L | 44/44 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.65 µg/L No EPA limit set | 17/44 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1160 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1145.5 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1250 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0089 mg/L 59% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 53.995 µg/L 360% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L | 10/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 19.205 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.6523 pCi/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Atrazine | 0.3850 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4000 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8134 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.8180 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.0828 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0830 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.1435 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.19 µg/L | 2/44 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 1.936 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.99 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wilderness
Is Wilderness tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Wilderness's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wilderness's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wilderness serve?
Wilderness reports serving 13,274 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Wilderness had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 93 violations on file for Wilderness, of which 64 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.