Is Woodroam Subdivision Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Pittsylvania

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

186

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-07-17
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-07-17
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-07-17
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2020-07-17
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-08-01 → 2009-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	1497.5 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 2120 µg/L	26/26	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	5.61 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L	24/26	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0040 mg/L 27% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	21/21	LCR	2025
Nitrate-Nitrite	1602 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 1890 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	8.725 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.1 pCi/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2017
Barium	9.355 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.4085 pCi/L 28% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 1.43 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Fluoride	88.5 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 90 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Nitrate	730 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2017

35 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDibromochloromethaneEthylbenzeneMercuryNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: ADCOCK, CHRIS
Phone: 434-432-7135
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Woodroam Subdivision

Is Woodroam Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Woodroam Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodroam Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Gross Beta Particle Activity, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodroam Subdivision serve?

Woodroam Subdivision reports serving 80 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Woodroam Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 186 violations on file for Woodroam Subdivision, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.