Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1980-06-24 → 1981-06-23 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFHXS | 0.0031 µg/L | 3/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorite | 356.3 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 429 µg/L | 152/174 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 136/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86 µg/L | 136/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 136/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 78 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 107.3 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 45 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 99/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 243.9 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 676 µg/L | 67/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 44/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 20/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.8875 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 18/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0019 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Barium | 18 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 965.5 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 990 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.36 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Williamsburg, City of
Is Williamsburg, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Williamsburg, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Williamsburg, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Williamsburg, City of serve?
Williamsburg, City of reports serving 16,300 people in Virginia, per its EPA record.
Has Williamsburg, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Williamsburg, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.