Tap WaterIndex

Tap water quality report

Pulaski County Psa

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
19
detected
9,452
people served
19
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pulaski

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

19
health-based violations
47
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-12-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-12-10
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
326.2 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 643 µg/L
58/68 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
71.475 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.564 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1780 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
64.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.3 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
62.225 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.2 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.6 µg/L
55/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
35.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
54/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.4 µg/L
41/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.2765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.59 µg/L
28/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
15.01 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.4 µg/L
28/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2024
Barium
24.165 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 24.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
890 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
630 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
12.185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.4 µg/L
6/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
890 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8000 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.1 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2014
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about Pulaski County Psa

Is Pulaski County Psa tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Pulaski County Psa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pulaski County Psa's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pulaski County Psa serve?

Pulaski County Psa reports serving 9,452 people, per its EPA record.

Has Pulaski County Psa had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 47 violations on file for Pulaski County Psa, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.