Tap WaterIndex

← Utah

Tap water quality report

Uintah Highlands Improvement District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
18
detected
2,480
people served
5
health-based violations
Utah rankingsLead in UtahPFAS in Utah
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Weber

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
89
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-04-04
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-04-04
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-04-04
MON Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-02-28
MON Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-02-28
MON Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-02-28
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
72.8 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.6 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
37.435 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.8 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
343.258 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 815.9 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
4.2568 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.689 µg/L
29/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
431 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 440 µg/L
24/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0067 mg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 21/21 LCR 2024
Bromodichloromethane
10.79 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
29.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.8 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.2 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.015 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
10/13 SYR4 2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5.16 pCi/L 34%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.2 pCi/L
5/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
199.235 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.48 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 pCi/L
3/6 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
54.2 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 55 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
2 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3900 pCi/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2019
Selenium
0.7000 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SORENSEN, MATT J
Phone
801-476-0945
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Uintah Highlands Improvement District

Is Uintah Highlands Improvement District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Uintah Highlands Improvement District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Uintah Highlands Improvement District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Uintah Highlands Improvement District serve?

Uintah Highlands Improvement District reports serving 2,480 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Uintah Highlands Improvement District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 89 violations on file for Uintah Highlands Improvement District, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.