← Utah

Tap water quality report

Pleasant View Culinary Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
16
detected
9,250
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Weber

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
291
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-02-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-02-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-02-07
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-03-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-03-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-03-17
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2083.23 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4267.4 µg/L
76/92 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
617.7 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 700.3 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
4.45 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
39/41 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2023
Barium
119.25 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 123 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.9 pCi/L 26%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.9 pCi/L
9/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.055 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 pCi/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
300 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
6/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
8.32 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
0.9700 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
4/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
2.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
0.6000 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
500 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JACKSON, ROBERT TYSON
Phone
801-782-8529
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pleasant View Culinary Water

Is Pleasant View Culinary Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Pleasant View Culinary Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pleasant View Culinary Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pleasant View Culinary Water serve?

Pleasant View Culinary Water reports serving 9,250 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Pleasant View Culinary Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 291 violations on file for Pleasant View Culinary Water, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.