Is Hooper Water Improvement District Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Weber

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2017-01-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2017-01-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2017-01-28
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-12-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-12-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-12-30
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	136.404 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 255.9 µg/L	73/73	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	2.495 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L	48/72	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0033 mg/L 22% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	23/23	LCR	2024
Nitrate	809.3 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	18/48	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	6.97 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 11.7 µg/L	12/44	SYR4	2016–2019
TTHM	11.74 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L	12/44	SYR4	2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane	4.255 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L	8/44	SYR4	2016–2019
Arsenic	7.13 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	333 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.05 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L	6/44	SYR4	2016–2019
Fluoride	200 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2019
Lithium	19.5 µg/L No EPA limit set	4/6	UCMR-5	2024
Gross Beta Particle Activity	4.12 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.3 pCi/L	3/3	SYR4	2018–2019
Selenium	0.8600 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L	3/9	SYR4	2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	2.2225 pCi/L 15% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 2.3 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2018–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/44	SYR4	2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	2.5 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L	1/44	SYR4	2016–2019

87 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: ALLEN, COLE J
Phone: 801-985-1991
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Hooper Water Improvement District

Is Hooper Water Improvement District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Hooper Water Improvement District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hooper Water Improvement District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hooper Water Improvement District serve?

Hooper Water Improvement District reports serving 20,820 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Hooper Water Improvement District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for Hooper Water Improvement District, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.