Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-15 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-15 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-15 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-15 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-15 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 6.62 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L | 93/96 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 232.275 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 241.3 µg/L | 40/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 14.445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.015 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 96.3 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 97 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 291.005 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 4.225 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 42.05 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.1 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.76 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.61 pCi/L 17% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.7 pCi/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 7.78 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 42.3 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Lead | 1.9 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 100 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake
Is Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake serve?
Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake reports serving 0 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 172 violations on file for Washington County Wcd - Quail Lake, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.