Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 6.825 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 11.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.8 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 15.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 62.38 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 380.64 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 4.06 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 7.4 pCi/L 49% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.8 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 37.17 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.09 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.365 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrate | 258 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 4 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 3.1 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.6600 pCi/L 13% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 1 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
52 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water
Is Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water serve?
Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water reports serving 0 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 417 violations on file for Washington County Wcd - Kayenta Water, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.