Tap WaterIndex

← Utah

Tap water quality report

Woodland Hills City

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
13
detected
1,605
people served
4
health-based violations
Utah rankingsLead in UtahPFAS in Utah
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Utah

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
412
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-11-01 → 1995-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
127 µg/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 179 µg/L
41/42 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
5.75 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L
39/42 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 17/17 LCR 2023
Nitrate
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
67.84 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
6.04 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.5 pCi/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.27 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
1.955 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2015–2019
Selenium
9.97 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
198 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.9 pCi/L 38%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2012
Nitrate-Nitrite
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Toluene
0.7000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2015–2019
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MICKELSEN, TED
Phone
801-423-3900
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Woodland Hills City

Is Woodland Hills City tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Woodland Hills City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodland Hills City's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodland Hills City serve?

Woodland Hills City reports serving 1,605 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Woodland Hills City had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 412 violations on file for Woodland Hills City, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.