Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-06-20 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-06-20 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 627.9 µg/L 6.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1684.5 µg/L | 46/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 190.6 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 377.4 µg/L | 41/41 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 5.87 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.8 µg/L | 34/41 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 15.04 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 79.13 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.9 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 9.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 304.06 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 305.8 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.61 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.24 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.955 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.29 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 pCi/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.095 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 17.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/8 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.3 pCi/L 15% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Santaquin City
Is Santaquin City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Santaquin City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Santaquin City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Santaquin City serve?
Santaquin City reports serving 17,532 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Santaquin City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 142 violations on file for Santaquin City, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.