Is Stansbury Park Improvement District Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Tooele

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

111

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-07-01 → 2009-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-07-01 → 2009-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-07-01 → 2009-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1994-10-01 → 1994-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1994-08-01 → 1994-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	2600 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	60/60	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	193.965 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 212 µg/L	40/40	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	5 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L	35/40	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0026 mg/L 17% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	23/23	LCR	2025
Lithium	48 µg/L No EPA limit set	10/10	UCMR-5	2024
Arsenic	2.36 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	148.05 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 154 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Selenium	12.72 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 13.7 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	8.505 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9 pCi/L	4/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	2181.86 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 2254.8 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2017
TTHM	1.27 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L	4/10	SYR4	2015–2019
Bromoform	1.26 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L	3/11	SYR4	2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	3.5 pCi/L 23% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L	3/14	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	195.275 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 200 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Cyanide	8 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L	1/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/11	SYR4	2014–2019

90 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: PALMER, BRETT
Phone: 435-882-7922
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Stansbury Park Improvement District

Is Stansbury Park Improvement District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Stansbury Park Improvement District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Stansbury Park Improvement District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Lithium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Stansbury Park Improvement District serve?

Stansbury Park Improvement District reports serving 9,839 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Stansbury Park Improvement District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 111 violations on file for Stansbury Park Improvement District, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.