← Utah

Tap water quality report

Magna Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
24
detected
32,100
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Salt Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
224
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-02-01 → 2016-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
11 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L
222/222 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
15.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L
135/141 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
53.02 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 67 µg/L
129/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.9 µg/L
125/140 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.9 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
121/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
11.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.5 µg/L
102/140 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.6385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.08 µg/L
102/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
23.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.6 µg/L
100/140 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
413.14 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3999.8 µg/L
92/93 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11.815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L
88/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.1 µg/L
87/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.25 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
71/92 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
4790 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4800 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Fluoride
493.325 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 513.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Xylenes, Total
6.53 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
8/35 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
258 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 UCMR-5 2024
Ethylbenzene
0.9800 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
5/35 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
45.24 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
8.6 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
34.63 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
4365 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4500 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2013
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5.6 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
1/35 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.2 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2013–2017
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DILLEY, CLINT
Phone
801-250-2118
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Magna Water District

Is Magna Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Magna Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Magna Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Bromoform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Magna Water District serve?

Magna Water District reports serving 32,100 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Magna Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 224 violations on file for Magna Water District, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.