Tap WaterIndex

← Utah

Tap water quality report

Granger-Hunter Improvement District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
25
detected
121,083
people served
3
health-based violations
Utah rankingsLead in UtahPFAS in Utah
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Salt Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
51
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-12-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
56.73 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73.8 µg/L
255/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
15.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.2 µg/L
254/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.821 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L
254/256 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
72.14 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.4 µg/L
254/254 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.3 µg/L
253/254 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.62 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.4 µg/L
253/254 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.3 µg/L
253/254 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
829.5 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1747 µg/L
211/211 SYR4 2012–2018
Copper
285.17 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 786.7 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
6.1435 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.01 µg/L
80/256 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.935 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
74/84 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.41 µg/L
63/254 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
7.575 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.9 µg/L
26/27 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
65.75 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L
26/27 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 24/24 LCR 2025
Selenium
6.6 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 21/27 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.43 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 pCi/L
20/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
6400 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 18/94 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
26.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 15/18 UCMR-5 2024
Mercury
0.3500 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4000 µg/L
11/27 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.91 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L
7/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
6.6 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 6/27 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.6980 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.7100 pCi/L
5/6 SYR4 2016–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
746.05 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L
3/19 SYR4 2014–2018
Asbestos
0.1600 MFL 2.3%
of the EPA limit 7 MFL
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HELM, JASON
Phone
801-968-3551
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Granger-Hunter Improvement District

Is Granger-Hunter Improvement District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Granger-Hunter Improvement District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Granger-Hunter Improvement District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Granger-Hunter Improvement District serve?

Granger-Hunter Improvement District reports serving 121,083 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Granger-Hunter Improvement District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 51 violations on file for Granger-Hunter Improvement District, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.