← Utah

Tap water quality report

Waterpro Inc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
25
detected
33,100
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Salt Lake

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
433
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
66.675 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.3 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47.65 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.5 µg/L
116/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
53.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66.4 µg/L
110/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
15.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L
105/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
27.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.9 µg/L
105/105 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L
99/105 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L
70/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
870.995 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1013.9 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
14.65 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
55/62 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
2000 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2600 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2023
Bromoform
2.495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
22/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
17/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
960 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/16 UCMR-5 2023
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.98 pCi/L 60%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.1 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
970 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
15.1 pCi/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 16 pCi/L
7/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
39.3 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
804.475 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 935 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1.9 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
2.44 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
16.54 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.77 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
2/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Cyanide
7 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JENSEN, DARRIN L
Phone
801-571-2232
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Waterpro Inc

Is Waterpro Inc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Waterpro Inc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Waterpro Inc's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Waterpro Inc serve?

Waterpro Inc reports serving 33,100 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Waterpro Inc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 433 violations on file for Waterpro Inc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.