Is Cedar Valley Water Conservancy Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Iron

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

507

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	1300 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 1400 µg/L	88/114	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	75.415 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 91.7 µg/L	28/30	SYR4	2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	5.725 pCi/L 38% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 6.3 pCi/L	28/40	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	8.64 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.4 pCi/L	27/41	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	59.8 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 75 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	300 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2013–2019
Arsenic	3.49 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L	19/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Selenium	2.6 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L	19/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	6.375 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L	16/30	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.00018 mg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	7/7	LCR	2026
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.86 pCi/L 37% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 1.9 pCi/L	5/5	SYR4	2012–2014
Xylenes, Total	3.425 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L	4/48	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	5.31 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L	3/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Cyanide	2.9 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L worst single sample: 3 µg/L	3/20	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.16 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L	3/8	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	11.74 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L	3/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromoform	1.455 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	4.62 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2013–2019
Ethylbenzene	0.5950 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L	2/48	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	1.5 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/8	SYR4	2013–2019

57 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: FELTNER, TRACY HOBART
Phone: 435-865-9901
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cedar Valley Water Conservancy

Is Cedar Valley Water Conservancy tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Cedar Valley Water Conservancy's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cedar Valley Water Conservancy's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cedar Valley Water Conservancy serve?

Cedar Valley Water Conservancy reports serving 3,995 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Cedar Valley Water Conservancy had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 507 violations on file for Cedar Valley Water Conservancy, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.