Is Cedar Highlands Subdivision Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Iron

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2011-03-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2011-03-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-04-01 → 2009-04-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-04-01 → 2009-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	1400 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 6800 µg/L	46/46	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	1263.04 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1620 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	4.275 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L	22/27	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.0021 mg/L 14% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	15/15	LCR	2024
Arsenic	1.3 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	70.55 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 71 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	300 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity	5.75 pCi/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.8 pCi/L	6/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Selenium	1.95 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	4.135 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	5.45 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.325 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L	4/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	3.175 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 3.4 pCi/L	4/8	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	8.18 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L	3/4	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	6330 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 6600 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2012
Dichloroacetic Acid	1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/4	SYR4	2013–2019

58 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: FELTNER, TRACY HOBART
Phone: 435-865-9901
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cedar Highlands Subdivision

Is Cedar Highlands Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Cedar Highlands Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cedar Highlands Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cedar Highlands Subdivision serve?

Cedar Highlands Subdivision reports serving 100 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Cedar Highlands Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 99 violations on file for Cedar Highlands Subdivision, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.