Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-08-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-03-20 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-03-20 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 101.96 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 107 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.55 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 11/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 28.52 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.7 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.4400 pCi/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 6 pCi/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 7.3 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
25 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Thompson Special Services District
Is Thompson Special Services District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Thompson Special Services District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Thompson Special Services District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Thompson Special Services District serve?
Thompson Special Services District reports serving 85 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Thompson Special Services District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 180 violations on file for Thompson Special Services District, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.