← Utah

Tap water quality report

Fruit Heights City Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
20
detected
6,075
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Davis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
88
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
765.471 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1735.43 µg/L
59/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
30.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.4 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
44.71 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.8 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
28.6 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.79 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
42/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.261 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.067 µg/L
41/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0059 mg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1995 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
7/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.9280 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9600 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
670.265 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
6.07 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.1 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
9.66 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
40.6 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Selenium
0.8000 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Lithium
9.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 UCMR-5 2024
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LEONARD, LAYNE DILLON
Phone
801-648-4421
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fruit Heights City Water

Is Fruit Heights City Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Fruit Heights City Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fruit Heights City Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fruit Heights City Water serve?

Fruit Heights City Water reports serving 6,075 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Fruit Heights City Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 88 violations on file for Fruit Heights City Water, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.