Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 765.471 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1735.43 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 30.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.4 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 44.71 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.8 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28.6 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 42/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.261 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.067 µg/L | 41/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0059 mg/L 39% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 1995 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.57 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 7/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.9280 pCi/L 19% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9600 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 670.265 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 6.07 pCi/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.1 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 9.66 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 40.6 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Selenium | 0.8000 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Lithium | 9.92 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fruit Heights City Water
Is Fruit Heights City Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Fruit Heights City Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fruit Heights City Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fruit Heights City Water serve?
Fruit Heights City Water reports serving 6,075 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Fruit Heights City Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 88 violations on file for Fruit Heights City Water, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.