Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-12-01 → 2002-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2015-03-24 → 2015-06-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2014-11-02 → 2015-02-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 182.875 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 295.8 µg/L | 108/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 4.7 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 86/108 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 76.1 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 109 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 55.54 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 86 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 62.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 94.1 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 54/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 27.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L | 52/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.7 µg/L | 49/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 300 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.9400 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 5/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 3/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 21.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/4 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Barium | 64 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Fluoride | 200 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 2/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 0.7000 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Bromate | 10 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/44 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Price River Wid
Is Price River Wid tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Price River Wid's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Price River Wid's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Price River Wid serve?
Price River Wid reports serving 5,790 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Price River Wid had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 50 violations on file for Price River Wid, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.