Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-09-21 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 102.865 µg/L 7.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 593 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 4.09 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 32/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate | 755 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L | 30/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0019 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 16/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 24.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.7 µg/L | 16/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 14/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 34.14 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 12/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.3 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L | 11/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 11/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/5 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Barium | 100.38 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 100.7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7950 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L | 2/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 167.155 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 168.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.54 pCi/L 10% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.6 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 2.891 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 680 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Selenium | 1.08 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Nitrite | 30 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Price Municipal Corporation
Is Price Municipal Corporation tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Price Municipal Corporation's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Price Municipal Corporation's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Price Municipal Corporation serve?
Price Municipal Corporation reports serving 8,867 people in Utah, per its EPA record.
Has Price Municipal Corporation had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 261 violations on file for Price Municipal Corporation, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.