← Utah

Tap water quality report

Price Municipal Corporation

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
21
detected
8,867
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Carbon

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
261
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-09-21

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
102.865 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 593 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
4.09 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
32/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
755 µg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L
30/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
7.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
16/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
24.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.7 µg/L
16/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
14/19 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
34.14 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
12/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.3 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
11/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
11/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/5 UCMR-5 2025
Barium
100.38 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 100.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Bromoform
0.7950 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
2/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
167.155 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 168.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.54 pCi/L 10%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.6 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.891 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
680 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Selenium
1.08 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2019
Nitrite
30 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NELSON, MILES
Phone
435-637-5010
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Price Municipal Corporation

Is Price Municipal Corporation tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Price Municipal Corporation's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Price Municipal Corporation's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Price Municipal Corporation serve?

Price Municipal Corporation reports serving 8,867 people in Utah, per its EPA record.

Has Price Municipal Corporation had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 261 violations on file for Price Municipal Corporation, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.