← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Cedar Park

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
23
detected
86,939
people served
10
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Williamson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
29
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-10-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-04-01 → 1996-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-01-01 → 1996-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1979-06-26 → 1979-07-25

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0050 µg/L 1/8 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
25.015 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.8 µg/L
260/260 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
27.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L
260/260 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
22.225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.3 µg/L
260/260 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.735 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
252/252 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
77.14 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L
252/253 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
26.545 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.3 µg/L
252/252 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
251/252 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L
244/252 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
7.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
233/260 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
721 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L
187/189 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
4.448 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
115/189 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
501.5 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 510 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
33/252 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.1 µg/L
29/252 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2023
Fluoride
733 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 740 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
67.61 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Cyanide
49.5 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 50 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
2.35 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1.03 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
Selenium
3.98 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PENNIMAN-MORIN, JIM
Phone
512-923-4472
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Cedar Park

Is City of Cedar Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in City of Cedar Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Cedar Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Cedar Park serve?

City of Cedar Park reports serving 86,939 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Cedar Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 29 violations on file for City of Cedar Park, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.