← Texas

Tap water quality report

Windermere Community

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 112 contaminants and detected 36. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

112
contaminants tested
36
detected
21,231
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Travis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
46
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2019-01-01 → 2021-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0092 µg/L 8/10 2025
PFHXS 0.0065 µg/L 8/10 2025
Pfpea 0.0059 µg/L 8/10 2025
PFOS 0.0075 µg/L 6/10 2025
Pfba 0.0057 µg/L 4/10 2025
Pfhxa 0.0039 µg/L 4/10 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
673.5 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L
100/102 SYR4 2013–2017
Nitrate
2133.5 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2620 µg/L
78/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
20.67 µg/L 138%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 132 µg/L
68/102 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.24 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.9 µg/L
68/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
64/124 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
16.655 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.4 µg/L
62/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.525 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
56/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
45/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
43/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
7.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.7 µg/L
37/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L
27/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Barium
64.625 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.1 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
2010.5 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2170 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2224 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2620 µg/L
12/15 SYR4 2012–2015
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
10.685 pCi/L 71%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 11 pCi/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2018
Cyanide
96.84 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
8/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
9.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.8 µg/L
8/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.712 pCi/L 54%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2018
Thallium, Total
1.039 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.21 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
33.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/11 UCMR-5 2025
Diquat
1.64 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 20 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
5/27 SYR4 2015–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
22.704 µg/L 378%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
3/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.07 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 pCi/L
3/10 SYR4 2014–2018
Arsenic
3.3775 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
2/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
1.1 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2014–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.785 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
2/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.6950 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
2/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.19 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2013–2019
76 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BARRY, CHUCK
Phone
737-376-2534
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Windermere Community

Is Windermere Community tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 36 contaminants in Windermere Community's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Windermere Community's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Windermere Community serve?

Windermere Community reports serving 21,231 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Windermere Community had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 46 violations on file for Windermere Community, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.