Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
6
health-based violations
23
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-12-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1982-06-09 → 1983-06-08 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1979-06-18 → 1979-07-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1979-06-18 → 1980-06-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-02-13 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-02-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-11-15 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-11-15 |
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 490.8 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1840 µg/L | 187/188 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3.483 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.28 µg/L | 147/188 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1521 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1590 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 28.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.1 µg/L | 35/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.285 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L | 34/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 16.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L | 34/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 86.44 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88.9 µg/L | 33/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 13.65 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.6 µg/L | 31/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 23.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.8 µg/L | 27/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 26/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L | 22/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0012 mg/L 8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lithium | 12.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 11/12 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1392.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1530 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 6/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.3250 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3300 µg/L | 3/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 382 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 65.74 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.4 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 2/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 30 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.9 µg/L 6.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.1 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 65 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1100 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Manor
Is City of Manor tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in City of Manor's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Manor's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Manor serve?
City of Manor reports serving 19,620 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Manor had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 23 violations on file for City of Manor, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.