Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.4 µg/L | 258/258 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L | 258/258 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 26.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 74.3 µg/L | 257/258 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 64.755 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 250/251 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.3 µg/L | 248/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33.505 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59 µg/L | 248/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L | 248/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 191/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.94 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 161/258 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 319 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 484 µg/L | 95/95 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L | 89/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 80/250 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 10 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 49/95 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 585 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 654 µg/L | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Atrazine | 0.3765 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3900 µg/L | 10/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.4440 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4800 µg/L | 9/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 819.4 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 846 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 63.1 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 64 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Cyanide | 63.94 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.8 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 255.95 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 272 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Chromium | 1.46 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.4885 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.52 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.347 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.36 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.2000 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.8000 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
74 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Grapevine
Is City of Grapevine tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 34 contaminants in City of Grapevine's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Grapevine's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Grapevine serve?
City of Grapevine reports serving 52,346 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Grapevine had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for City of Grapevine, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.