Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-12-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-08-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-08-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-08-19 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 289.65 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 423 µg/L | 44/46 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lead | 6.014 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.9 µg/L | 27/46 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 14.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L | 25/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L | 22/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 9.93 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L | 20/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00092 mg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 33.96 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.6 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 517 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 544 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.075 pCi/L 62% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.1 pCi/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 495 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 510 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.98 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 pCi/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 50 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 24.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.9950 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 2/17 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chromium | 21.8 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 50 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Orange County Wcid 2
Is Orange County Wcid 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Orange County Wcid 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Orange County Wcid 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Orange County Wcid 2 serve?
Orange County Wcid 2 reports serving 4,074 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Orange County Wcid 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 41 violations on file for Orange County Wcid 2, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.