← Texas

Tap water quality report

Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
15
detected
249
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
39
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
247.2 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 416 µg/L
37/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
12.7335 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.7 µg/L
22/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Barium
327.2 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 328 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.937 pCi/L 59%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
420 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
14.46 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.9 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
3.72 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
4.795 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5.95 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Nitrate
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
6 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
1 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HAVENBEKE, ANDY, VAN
Phone
936-588-1166

Frequently asked questions about Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc

Is Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Barium, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc serve?

Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc reports serving 249 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for Pine Lake Subdivision North Wsc, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.