Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
0
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Archived | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1992-04-01 → 1992-04-30 |
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 261.6 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 370 µg/L | 73/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3.79 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 35/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 942.5 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 26/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.332 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L | 25/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.51 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 19/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.112 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 17/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 14.22 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00083 mg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Chloroform | 1.773 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.92 µg/L | 8/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.145 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 8/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 184.2 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 189 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 7/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromate | 19.7625 µg/L 198% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.5 µg/L | 6/84 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.025 pCi/L 61% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.1 pCi/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 165 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/6 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 4/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 8.675 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 pCi/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 733 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 750 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 8.04 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L | 3/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 5.315 pCi/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.4 pCi/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.3 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.7 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 9.1 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 1.9 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Southwest Milam Wsc
Is Southwest Milam Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Southwest Milam Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Southwest Milam Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Southwest Milam Wsc serve?
Southwest Milam Wsc reports serving 11,739 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Southwest Milam Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Southwest Milam Wsc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.