← Texas

Tap water quality report

Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
18
detected
163
people served
78
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Midland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

78
health-based violations
184
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9835.5 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10500 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
16.385 µg/L 164%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.1 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
8886 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9150 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2015
Copper
1140.3 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1890 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
6.346 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.25 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
16.4 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L
5/12 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
54.09 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.1 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Uranium
28.15 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1595 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1620 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
7.8 pCi/L 52%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 8 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
11.57 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.6 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
42.84 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 43.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
7.024 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.25 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.16 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
3.6 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
1/1 LCR 2024
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WALLACE, DAVID, STANLEY
Phone
432-550-7505
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park

Is Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Arsenic, Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park serve?

Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park reports serving 163 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 184 violations on file for Spring Meadow Mobile Home Park, of which 78 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.