← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Venus

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
24
detected
3,816
people served
65
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Johnson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

65
health-based violations
133
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0042 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfba 0.0079 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0036 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
20.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.6 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
54.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 98.7 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
22.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.9 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
168.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
82.16 µg/L 103%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 118 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
241.15 µg/L 402%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 255 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
49.885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.7 µg/L
44/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
14.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
43/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
13.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.1 µg/L
42/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
33/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
4163 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4540 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
39.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45.3 µg/L
23/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
174 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 276 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrate
240 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2024
Lead
8.656 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
9/21 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrate-Nitrite
190.9 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 202 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
15.95 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Cyanide
18.5 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5.3 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GALAVIZ, ALEJANDRO
Phone
972-366-3348
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Venus

Is City of Venus tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in City of Venus's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Venus's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Venus serve?

City of Venus reports serving 3,816 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Venus had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 133 violations on file for City of Venus, of which 65 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.