← Texas

Tap water quality report

Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
14
detected
975
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jasper

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
21
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-02
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
38.95 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
12/22 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
63.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 138 µg/L
12/23 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
99.12 µg/L 124%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 164 µg/L
9/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
6.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L
8/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.17 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L
8/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
3.62 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
7/22 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2024
Barium
50.2 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.475 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
129 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
2/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/23 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
6.6 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BALUSEK, WAYLON
Phone
409-384-6301
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2

Is Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 serve?

Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 reports serving 975 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 21 violations on file for Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.