Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 38.95 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 12/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Chloroform | 63.09 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 138 µg/L | 12/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 99.12 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 164 µg/L | 9/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L | 8/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 13.17 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L | 8/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 3.62 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 7/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0027 mg/L 18% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2024 |
| Barium | 50.2 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.475 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 129 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 22.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.6 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2
Is Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 serve?
Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 reports serving 975 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 21 violations on file for Upper Jasper County Water Authority 2, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.