Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

Graced Land East

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
66
people served
0
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Hutchinson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
52
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-12-30
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2021-12-23
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2021-07-04

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
355 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0117 mg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 10/10 LCR 2025
Lead
3.175 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
6/11 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.85 µg/L 8.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
2.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
4.43 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Dibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MCCLELLAN, JO LEA
Phone
806-274-3018
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Graced Land East

Is Graced Land East tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Graced Land East's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Graced Land East's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Graced Land East serve?

Graced Land East reports serving 66 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Graced Land East had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 52 violations on file for Graced Land East, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.