Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
1
health-based violations
10
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Archived | 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31 |
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 564.69 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 988.1 µg/L | 123/124 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L | 118/118 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 48.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.3 µg/L | 118/118 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L | 117/118 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.565 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.6 µg/L | 110/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 66.065 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.5 µg/L | 110/111 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.505 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 55.9 µg/L | 110/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L | 110/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 8.5575 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.4 µg/L | 96/124 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 56/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 39/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 817 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 19/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0036 mg/L 24% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 17.555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.8 µg/L | 10/118 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.3330 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3400 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 227.75 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 68.06 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 71 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.2505 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.33 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 910.8 µg/L 9.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 960 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 5.2 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Arsenic | 0.8500 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Asbestos | 0.3904 MFL 5.6% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Cyanide | 136 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 0.5000 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cash Sud
Is Cash Sud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 32 contaminants in Cash Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cash Sud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cash Sud serve?
Cash Sud reports serving 25,875 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Cash Sud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Cash Sud, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.