Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 117 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.6975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.62 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.2725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.4925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.37 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.3025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.55 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 131.7 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 138 µg/L | 8/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0066 mg/L 44% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 235.6 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 20.13 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.07 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 4.226 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.55 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Barium | 13.9 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 3.035 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 2/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 57.835 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Cyanide | 10.7 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 13 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.5200 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.6 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.9 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ratcliff Wsc
Is Ratcliff Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Ratcliff Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ratcliff Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ratcliff Wsc serve?
Ratcliff Wsc reports serving 275 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Ratcliff Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 66 violations on file for Ratcliff Wsc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.