← Texas

Tap water quality report

Harris County Wcid 89

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
25
detected
9,033
people served
23
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

23
health-based violations
33
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-07-01 → 2007-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
390 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1170 µg/L
93/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
15.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L
72/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
35.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.9 µg/L
72/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L
70/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.3 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
52.685 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.8 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
45.165 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.7 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.785 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L
62/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
53/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.225 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.17 µg/L
36/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1021 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1210 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.535 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
12/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00020 mg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2023
Lithium
22.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 UCMR-5 2024
Atrazine
0.2950 µg/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3100 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.1500 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
144.78 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 157 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
426 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
5/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1168 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1210 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2014
Cyanide
80 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2015
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.1300 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
10 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2014
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SMITH, MICHAEL
Phone
713-651-3688

Frequently asked questions about Harris County Wcid 89

Is Harris County Wcid 89 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Harris County Wcid 89's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Harris County Wcid 89's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Harris County Wcid 89 serve?

Harris County Wcid 89 reports serving 9,033 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Harris County Wcid 89 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 33 violations on file for Harris County Wcid 89, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.