Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-03-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 172 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 212 µg/L | 51/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Nitrate | 145 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 16.506 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.2 µg/L | 13/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 6/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 6/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 6/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 155 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 230 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 233 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 220 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Arsenic | 2.89 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 9.66 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.48 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 3/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 17.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/3 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.255 pCi/L 65% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Combined Uranium | 4.625 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2.95 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Selenium | 4.48 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.3 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mission Bend Mud 1
Is Mission Bend Mud 1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Mission Bend Mud 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mission Bend Mud 1's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mission Bend Mud 1 serve?
Mission Bend Mud 1 reports serving 6,546 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Mission Bend Mud 1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Mission Bend Mud 1, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.