Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
0
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-02-09 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-02-09 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-13 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-10-13 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L | 117/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 25.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.9 µg/L | 117/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 106/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29.895 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.6 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 43 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.9 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.28 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.4 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.6 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 91/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 546.2 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1348.1 µg/L | 81/86 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate | 750 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1150 µg/L | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 29/117 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11.084 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L | 25/86 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Atrazine | 0.3305 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3400 µg/L | 20/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 16/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2024 |
| Simazine | 0.1505 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1700 µg/L | 14/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 604 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 620 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lithium | 33.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/11 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Barium | 83.475 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.8 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 512.5 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 530 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Cyanide | 184 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Nitrite | 28 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.865 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 0.1295 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1300 µg/L | 2/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.2 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.5000 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 1 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 4.3 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
74 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Langham Creek Utility District
Is Langham Creek Utility District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 35 contaminants in Langham Creek Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Langham Creek Utility District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Langham Creek Utility District serve?
Langham Creek Utility District reports serving 10,377 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Langham Creek Utility District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for Langham Creek Utility District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.