← Texas

Tap water quality report

Parkway Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 27. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
27
detected
7,323
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-06-01 → 2003-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0076 µg/L 3/8 2023
Pfhxa 0.0060 µg/L 3/8 2023
Pfpea 0.0067 µg/L 3/8 2023
PFBS 0.0031 µg/L 1/8 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
47.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 76.9 µg/L
64/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
19.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.6 µg/L
62/66 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
68.265 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 131 µg/L
60/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.8 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L
58/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.5 µg/L
57/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
22.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 94 µg/L
56/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
185.2 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 271 µg/L
53/62 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.5 µg/L
44/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1132 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1150 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
18/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Lead
4.973 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.14 µg/L
12/62 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
10/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1125 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1140 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2015
Bromoform
3.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
5/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
345.5 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2015
Lithium
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/8 UCMR-5 2023
Barium
154.125 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 159 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dalapon
1.975 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
315.5 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
2.7 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Atrazine
0.1400 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
4.8 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2017
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MCNEIL, BRENDA
Phone
713-651-5151

Frequently asked questions about Parkway Utility District

Is Parkway Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Parkway Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Parkway Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Parkway Utility District serve?

Parkway Utility District reports serving 7,323 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Parkway Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for Parkway Utility District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.