Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
68
health-based violations
283
violations on file
6
still open
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 376 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 919 µg/L | 169/187 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 22.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.6 µg/L | 135/141 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 103.94 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 135 µg/L | 127/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 123/141 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 37.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44 µg/L | 119/141 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 58.36 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.4 µg/L | 110/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 56.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89.4 µg/L | 101/141 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 99/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 38.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59.3 µg/L | 99/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.5 µg/L | 79/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1520 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1610 µg/L | 54/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 20.92 µg/L 139% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.4 µg/L | 37/187 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 23/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 19/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 109 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 234 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1577 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1610 µg/L | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lithium | 36.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/10 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Dalapon | 1.085 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 4/117 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 9.87 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 pCi/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 5.865 pCi/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.7000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.23 pCi/L 45% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Springs Hill Sud
Is Springs Hill Sud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 27 contaminants in Springs Hill Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Springs Hill Sud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Springs Hill Sud serve?
Springs Hill Sud reports serving 35,541 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Springs Hill Sud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 283 violations on file for Springs Hill Sud, of which 68 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.