Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-12-22 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-12-22 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 145.8 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 294 µg/L | 20/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate | 125 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.388 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 15/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.488 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 13/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.882 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 10/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 11.065 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L | 10/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.676 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.72 µg/L | 9/23 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 2.385 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L | 6/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 72.4 µg/L 121% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 96 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 119.4 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 250.4 µg/L 6.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 2.605 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 47.6 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 51 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.832 pCi/L 77% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.9 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.7 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 93.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 0.5380 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.0250 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
58 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wildwood Water
Is Wildwood Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Wildwood Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wildwood Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wildwood Water serve?
Wildwood Water reports serving 525 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Wildwood Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 32 violations on file for Wildwood Water, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.