Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 244.75 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L | 46/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lead | 9.327 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.45 µg/L | 22/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate | 650 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 32.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.8 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.94 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 28.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.8 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 44.84 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.1 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 38.92 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.4 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.81 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.1770 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1800 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 429 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 71.615 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 396 µg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 12.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/4 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Cyanide | 120 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3 pCi/L 60% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 4.5 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrite | 20 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Simazine | 0.1200 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
79 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Big Oaks Mud
Is Big Oaks Mud tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 30 contaminants in Big Oaks Mud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Big Oaks Mud's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Big Oaks Mud serve?
Big Oaks Mud reports serving 6,450 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Big Oaks Mud had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Big Oaks Mud, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.